4 Responses to “4th and L land ownership”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. mmm

    Looks like the church may also be delinquent on tax payments on those parcels.

  2. tom veil

    It doesn’t squash the idea so much as it forces those who want the park to stop talking to the government and start talking to the church. I highly doubt the church wants this land to remain blighted, but on the other hand they might not have enough cash on hand to make improvements without outside help.

  3. Douglas A. Willinger

    Who knows? Their involvement with the placing of the apartment building on New Jersey Avenue blocking the continuation of the unused I-395 northbound on ramp suggests they are hardly pro civic.