Park Improvements at 2nd and Mass (proposed)

Last night a meeting to discuss the park at the confluence of 2nd, Mass and H Street was held. Attendees included, but not limited to, residents from the Sonata, a representative from the office building at 251 H Street, our MVT CID executive director Bill McLeod, president of the MVSNA Cary Silverman, Thor Nelson from the Office of Planning and Sarah Moulton from the Department of Park and Recreations.

The park is presently an under utilized eyesore. The heavy traffic surrounding the park isolates it. Homeless sleep in the park with one often camped inside the center ring of bushes. There was also talk of a recent illegal BBQ (by homeless?) at the park. The park is not well maintained, safe or inviting.

Funding is not presently available to perform a major overhaul of the park. Long term this could be negotiated with the developer seeking air rights over I-395 but improvements are needed in the short term. The Office of Planning (OP) has identified a transportation funds grant program that could provide the modest funding needed for small scale improvements including critical irrigation. With this intersection being one of the busiest in the city it qualifies and has the visibility to increase likelihood to receive the grant. However the grant will require that ongoing park maintenance is secured. If this comes together the improvements could begin as soon as October.

Rendering for proposed improvements to park at 2nd, Mass and H

Rendering from Dept or Park & Recs (DPR)

The Department of Parks and Recs (DPR) has developed a set of design guidelines for the site. These cite the short term objectives for the park to be primarily beautification of the space and creation of a marker for the surrounding neighborhoods and the immediate area on Massachusetts Ave. DPR has also identified materials and plants that could be relocated from the Art Walk at the Old Convention Center site to keep costs down.

From the Draft document distributed by DPR:

Short Term Scenario Implementations Guidance:
  • Provide a minimal, but bold planting pallet to be both low maintenance and highly visible to passing motorists.
  • Focus tree planting on streets edges and in areas with significant soil depth.
  • Install focal artwork or monument to create a sense of place and draw for the area.
  • Provide benches and other seating to allow lunchtime gathering and passive use of the park
  • Preserve existing pavement areas and repair where needed
  • Implement “quick fix” pedestrian safety measures like: new cross walk painting, adding parking lanes to Mass Avenue next to park

Discussion turned more towards the homeless impact on the park. The Central Union Mission is opening a 150 bed shelter at the Gales School within a year just a block from the park. DPR’s position is that parks are an amenity for everyone including the homeless. It should be designed to be safe and engage all people.

Cary Silverman expanded upon his previous point of the Gales School shelter opening and pointed out that the isolation of the park is appealing to the homeless. He suggested the space needs a draw to bring surrounding residents across the busy streets to the park. There is no design for a prominent draw in the short term plans. An expenditure of a fountain or statue could be taken on longer term. A Sonata owner chimed in with the benefits of the park embracing dog owners. Dogs owners want green space to walk their pets and most presently walk to the Building Museum. She suggested the added benefit to the community that dogs tend to discourage vagrancy“scare people who know they are where they shouldn’t be.” I don’t think she’s suggesting anyone shouldn’t be at the park. But people shouldn’t be camping in the bushes . McLeod made note of this as he said “durable grass”.

Lastly, an important message was put forth that this park would NOT be THE PARK for the Triangle. Both DPR and the MVT CID want a larger more central green space less isolated by heavy traffic. There are some alternative that are being studied regarding this but they were not shared in the meeting. One possibility I have previously seen in the Mount Vernon Triangle Transportation and Public Realm Design Project suggests a park along a new extension of 3rd Street built out over I-395.

Note: Cary Silverman has also covered the meeting on his blog. Cary is spearheading a “Friend of the (name TBD) Park” effort.

Be the first to like.
SociBook Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon


  1. 1

    urbandogs says

    Hi, thanks for your description of the meeting! I spoke up about the dogs and the park and was told by Sarah Moulton of Dept. of Parks and Recreation to think about applying for a dog park. Having investigated the application process by going to the city website and talking to those who did it in Capitol Hill, it might be way too much work, especially if the area will just be developed again by real estate projects.

    On the other hand, people care about their dogs and such an activity might get folks involved in the community.

    My concern about the dog park is that the fence would have to be 5 feet high and that would not be very attractive given the plan that the city proposed at the July 30th meeting. How likely is that to happen, the proposed renovations?

    I don’t think I was quoted quite correctly about “scaring” people away, but rather a dog park would give residents a reason to go there and thus discourage vagrancy. If that happens, more people can enjoy the park, especially tax-paying ones!

    I think the city is right to mention that everyone has a right to enjoy the park, but homeless hangouts discourage home-owner presence. So, in the end, tax payers lose once again.

    Thanks for the additional information about what is going on with 395 and Gales School etc. That’s certainly useful to know, since I have just started to get involved.

    I would trade a healthy, vibrant neighborhood for a view of the Capitol any day. I think that would protect the value of my home just as well and give us all quality of life while we live here. So, that’s where our energy should go and includes working to ensure that the development plans include parks, green spaces, retail opportunities, etc.

    If folks have dogs and what to join the Yahoo! group DogsMVT (Dogs of Mount Vernon Triangle), our goal is to establish a dog park where the puppies can be off-leash and play with their friends (instead of getting hopelessly entagled in their leashes).


  2. 2

    fourthandeye says


    Thanks for chiming in. I agree that a fence would have to be high for a dog park. So you really couldn’t put it at the perimeter of the park because the last thing that space needs is more barriers to entry. Hopefully even if it can’t be a “dog park” in the fullest sense it can still be a useful space to take your dogs.

    Sorry about the misquote. I’m not working from transcripts of meetings just my shorthand notes. It’s hard to get word for word what people said. I actually did contemplate the right word to communicate the benefits of dogs on vagrancy. I felt “scare” was too strong but my vocabulary wasn’t coming up with a solid alternative. But I like the way you put in your comment “discourage vagrancy” and will update the post to reflect this.

  3. 3

    Anonymous says

    I recall from the meeting that the urban planning department would know fairly quickly if their proposal got funding. Is there anyone following up on that?

  4. 4

    urbandogs says

    I heard from Sarah Moulton at Parks and Recreation that the Dept. of Planning should hear back in about 2 weeks. That should be about mid-September.
    Concerning dog park options, it’s either that location or a future park for Mount Vernon Triangle when there is more development (possible conversion of 395). Otherwise, the closest DC parkland is not within walking distance of Mount Vernon Triangle (not the idea behind having a dog park here).
    Maybe a group of interested people can go to the ANC 6C meeting at the Newseum on September 12 to voice this issue? Ideas are welcome.

  5. 6

    Anonymous says

    Heavy traffic makes this park the kind of place you don’t visit without a clear purpose. That’s why it’s currently an island campground.

    In light of which… the dog run idea is excellent. The park might not even need a fence. Dogs in the street would have a traffic-calming effect.